CARED Perspectives: Ensuring That All Children Have a Seat at the Table When Discussing Gun Reform

This blog post is the first in the series, “CARED Perspectives,” developed by the APAGS Committee for the Advancement of Racial and Ethnic Diversity. This series will discuss current events and how these events relate to graduate students in psychology. If you are interested in contributing to the CARED Perspectives series, please contact Lincoln Hill.

Ensuring that All Children Have a Seat at the Table When Discussing Gun Reform

By Lincoln Hill

In response to the Marjory Stoneman Douglas school shooting on February 14th, 2018 where 17 people were killed and many more were  injured, student survivors organized and are continuing to develop youth-led protests to advocate for comprehensive legislation towards gun reform. Despite the acuity of the recent traumatic events that impacted their whole community, these students participated in a nationally televised townhall with elected officials just one week after the shooting, publicly challenging these officials to pass gun reform legislation; organized a march with approximately 832 events worldwide to keep children safer in schools just five weeks later; and structured a national school walkout day inviting students across the world to participate.

Many, myself included, have been astonished by what these students have accomplished in such a short amount of time (and with minimal adult intervention) . As a graduate assistant with Loyola University Chicago’s Center for the Human Rights of Children, I view the student led protests as a prime example of tenets from the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child in action, particularly the child’s right to participate in decision making processes that directly affect them. Additionally,  as a Black counseling psychologist-in-training with a focus on the mental health of racial/ethnic minority students, I am primarily struck by the public’s receptiveness to these youth-led protests compared to more critical media coverage of similar youth-led initiatives advocating for the safety of Black youth such as Black Lives Matter and The Dream Defenders. What do these response variations mean from a social justice perspective, particularly when efforts to advocate on behalf of Black youth who are disproportionately impacted by gun violence aren’t viewed as favorably by the public?

In the US, Black children and adolescents are excessively impacted by gun violence and are four times more likely to die by guns when compared to their White counterparts. Perhaps this stark reality contributes to the extremely high rate of suicide among Black children ages 5-11 years old — a rate that has nearly doubled in the past two decades, while that of White children has steadily decreased.  For children and adolescents living in violent neighborhoods and communities, witnessing shootings can lead to a plethora of psychosocial hardships including posttraumatic stress that can impact them into adulthood.

As psychologists-in-training, we have a duty to respond and support all children impacted by gun violence including those commonly left out of discourses pertaining to gun reform. While we take steps as a field advocating for legislative changes protecting the rights of children, we must challenge ourselves to provide platforms that amplify all children’s voices.

We want to hear what you think! Please share your thoughts on this topic in the comments section below.

Graduate Student Researchers for the Win

adult-attractive-beauty-255268Have you ever wondered how to get financial support for your research? APA maintains a directory with hundreds of opportunities for funding psychological research. Today, we take a closer look at one particular grant for graduate students and the amazing projects that will be getting a $1,000 boost.

Every year, APAGS sponsors the Psychological Science Research Grant (PSRG) to provide support for several graduate students conducting psychology research, with additional funding reserved specifically for diversity-focused studies. This $1,000 grant is used to fund innovative psychological science research projects. Graduate students in all fields of psychology and neuroscience (who are also APA student affiliates) are eligible.

PSRG netted a very competitive applicant pool this year. After careful review, 14 applicants were selected to receive funding. These students span several universities and research areas, including social, cognitive, clinical, community, evolutionary, and moral psychology. Seven of these proposed research projects specifically related to diversity, as defined by APA’s 2017 Multicultural Guidelines.

Here’s a brief peek of the 2017 winning projects:

  • Steven Hobaica (Washington State University) will be studying transgender individuals in cisnormative sex education. Steven aims to understand how exclusive educational experiences may affect transgender individuals’ physical and mental health outcomes, self-conceptions, and relationships.
  • Laura Werner (University of Nevada, Las Vegas) will be studying the aging of working memory. Laura plans to investigate whether processing speed and inhibition account for different aspects of working memory performance and age-related decline in working memory.
  • Amanda Sanchez (Florida International University) will be studying whether cultural formulation improves satisfaction, treatment engagement, and clinical outcomes among traditionally underserved children. As part of a dissertation, Amanda plans to augment assessment procedures for child behavior problems with a brief cultural assessment, as well as assess the effects of barriers to care on this augmentation.
  • Alyssa De Vito (Louisiana State University) will be studying the predictive utility of intraindividual cognitive variability measures as an early marker of cognitive decline. Alyssa will be working with individuals with mild cognitive impairment and analyzing intraindividual variability in executive functioning, memory, and timed performance tasks.
  • Erica Page (University of Cincinnati) will be developing and testing a causal framework between microaggressions and negative health outcomes. Erica aims to determine if microaggressions elicit physiological stress responses and lead to declines in working memory performance.
  • Amy Wing-Lam Chong (Cornell University) will be examining the extent to which age-related performance differences on the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) can be explained by reductions in exploration preferences and learning, and differences in risk preferences.
  • Julia Briskin (Wayne State University) will be studying the effect smartphone usage during in-person interactions with romantic partners has on romantic relationships. Julia’s research will provide and empirically test a theoretical framework to understand this effect, and identify potential ways to mitigate it.
  • Kyle Simon (University of Kentucky) will be developing a scale for conceptual future parenthood grief in LGBTQ+ individuals. Kyle plans to assess the reliability and validity of a newly created measure that gauges the level of grief that LGBTQ+ people experience about potentially never achieving a parenting identity.
  • Haley Bell (University of Nebraska-Lincoln) will be developing a multidimensional measure of gender dysphoria. Haley aims to develop, validate, and assess the reliability of the Gender Dysphoria Measure.
  • Megan Williams (University of Pennsylvania) will be studying body odors’ influence on mate quality estimation. Megan is interested in the mechanism by which body odors inform mate quality assessment, specifically sexual disgust and sexual attraction.
  • Megan Goldring (Columbia University) will be studying morality, social conformity, and blame attributions. Megan’s research on moral decision making will investigate the extent to which attributions of blame and praise depend on social conformity factors, agency, and intent, for judgements of commonplace and severe moral transgressions.
  • Sarah Arango (University of Texas at Austin) will be studying the ways that Syrian refugee youth living in Jordan develop resilience and cope with trauma and chronic stress. As a dissertation study, Sarah aims to examine the link between daily stressors, traumatic events, coping flexibility, well-being, and psychological distress in this population.
  • Hanan Hashem (University of Texas at Austin) will study solo status, religious identity, and ethnic identity as predictors of psychological distress and discrimination of American Muslim women.
  • Rachel Sweenie (University of Florida) will study the associations between stable and fluctuating psychosocial variables and inhaled corticosteroid treatment adherence, using ecological momentary assessment.

Congratulations to all our winners. We are excited to see whose name will be on the list next year. We hope it is yours! Be sure to send in your application before the deadline in early December for the 2018 PSRG.

The APAGS Science Committee would like to thank and acknowledge the help and support we received in reviewing applications this year. This includes members of the APAGS CARED and CSOGD Committees, as well as our Ad Hoc Reviewers: Emily Bernstein, Harvard University; Joshua Goodman , UC Santa Barbara; Danielle Krusemark, Florida State University; Brittany Lang, University of South Florida; and Danielle Taylor, Oklahoma State University.

Written by:

Brielle James (BS), Member, APAGS Science Committee                                                       Renee Cloutier (MS), Chair, APAGS Science Committee

International Students and the Internship Process

International_Flags_GlobePsychology graduate students face unique struggles compared to graduate students in other fields, as we are expected to be self-reflective, engage in self-care, and also examine our ability to work with others while making sure that we dedicate most of our time to work. The balance often becomes a very tricky process to negotiate. International students in graduate psychology programs experience additional barriers in comparison to their domestic counterparts, as they have to navigate local and national policies, immigration requirements, paperwork, and experiences of discrimination, on top of academic requirements. Further, it is not unusual for international students to feel isolated, especially in smaller programs where the international student community is scarce. In addition to cultural adjustment and a possible language barrier, international students also have to plan a timeline carefully to ensure they are up to date on immigration documentation. One of the most stressful experiences for international students in clinical, counseling, and school psychology programs is applying for the clinical internship. International students face unique challenges in this process, including a reduced number of sites that accept individuals without US citizenship or permanent residency.

The following video focuses specifically on the internship application process for international students, and provides insights and advice from international students who have successfully navigated this process. APAGS and APAGS-CARED have developed this short video to help international students feel more comfortable applying to their doctoral internship.

Some international students that have been through this process have provided the following advice:

• Ensure that there is enough time to plan for documentation of legal status
• Be resilient
• Be persistent
• Find mentorship from other international students
• Develop a close relationship with DCTs (Directors of Clinical Training)

Please check out the video below of interviews with international students who successfully matched on internship. The video was developed through a collaboration of APAGS and APAGS-CARED, and was edited by Nathanael Castro.

Match Day 2018: The Forecast is Looking Good!

As your APAGS Chair, I wanted to reach you on one of the most important days of the year for the psychology training community. The 2018 Match Day is upon us, and the forecast is looking good for students. We continue to make advances toward resolving the internship crisis, and we are always excited to see students progressing in their training. For those that did not match, we continue to be your ally in this struggle, and aim to support you through our advocacy efforts to ensure everyone has access to the training opportunities they deserve.

Let’s Talk Data

Here is today’s APPIC data about applicants seeking a 2018 internship:

  • 3,779 applicants participated in the Match, of which 3,727 were from accredited programs. A smaller student pool is likely because APPIC is now using stricter accreditation requirements for doctoral programs that send students into the Match.
  • 3,163 applicants matched in Phase I: An 88% overall match rate.
  • 85% of applicants who matched got one of their top three choices.
  • This is the first time there were fewer applicants than internship positions available (i.e., 3,906 positions available), which is a promising trend for future internship cohorts. For the 432 students that remain unmatched, 457 APA/CPA-accredited internship positions remain open. 

Although many students are celebrating the opportunities that await them on internships, many today remain unmatched, and we hope that the number of APA/CPA-accredited sites available in Phase II provides ample opportunity to secure a quality training experience this summer. We also hope that the 184 students who did not submit a rank list or withdrew their applications for reasons related to site availability advocate for their best outcomes and fare well.

I know that the pains of not matching can be personally burdensome, and the uncertainty about the coming year can be equally as draining. Be reassured that, just as there are terrific training opportunities available in Phase II, there are many terrific applicants that sites will be ecstatic to recruit. I know many high-quality, well-trained colleagues who matched in Phase II to terrific training opportunities, and I wish you all the best of luck as you continue the application process for this cycle.

Change is on the Rise

The internship crisis has improved over the years, and many more stakeholders are beginning to call it an imbalance. In its advocacy efforts, the APAGS Committee is always mindful of the training opportunities available to students. In our 2013-2018 Strategic Plan, we aimed for an APA/CPA-accredited internship for every student from an APA/CPA-accredited program. We are close to reaching that goal.

My belief is that greater emphasis will need to be placed on specialty training opportunities in the coming years. The substantial increase in APA/CPA-accredited internships has helped to resolve the internship crisis, but many students miss out on specialty training opportunities when they match to sites that are not the best fit for their training goals. Certain fields such as school psychology have fewer APA/CPA-accredited programs. Although many sites offer neuropsychological training at the internship level, when applicants fail to match to a site with such training opportunities, they become less competitive when securing postdocs within that specialty. Rehabilitation, health, forensic, and more — specialty tracks and training opportunities at the internship level are becoming increasingly prevalent, and we as a field should be aware that the crisis is about both supply and fit.

Our Advocacy Efforts

For those in the student community concerned about advocacy, the APAGS Committee has been actively working with the internship crisis at the forefront of our minds. Our past advocacy efforts have pushed for a $3 million internship stimulus package approved by the APA Council of Representatives, which  has been highly successful in the development of new training sites. Medicaid reimbursement for internship services has also helped to secure funding for additional training sites. We also produced an informative video and resource page on the internship crisis to spread awareness of the impact that not matching has on the lives of students. The APAGS Committee continues to focus on graduate and internship training opportunities for our constituents. If you have any perspectives on additional advocacy efforts, we are always appreciative of your input. Contact your APAGS Committee officers for additional information. Further, if you would like to have a place at the table, we encourage all APAGS members to consider applying for positions on the APAGS Committee.  Students of all backgrounds, subfields, and interests are encouraged to apply. These positions are the most effective way to advocate for your student peers within APA, as we strive for the highest quality training experience for all psychology graduate students.

Sincerely,

Justin E. Karr, M.Sc.

2018 APAGS Chair

How well are psychology programs addressing diversity training? National survey reveals results

The American Psychological Association of Graduate Students (APAGS) Committee on the Advancement of Racial and Ethnic Diversity (CARED) and Committee on Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity (CSOGD) recently finalized a mixed-methods study that explored the impact of diversity on the program and training experiences of APAGS members. Graduate students from programs across the United States, shared their perspectives on diversity and inclusion issues in their clinical and research training, courses, mentorship, and everyday interactions in their programs. The accompanying infographic presents a snapshot of some of the most relevant findings. The final page  provides some additional resources in addition to specific recommendations provided by students for how to improve programs’ diversity training and better support students from traditionally underrepresented backgrounds. For more information on the study, contact J. L. StewartPlease also view the full results and tables.

APAGS Diversity Infographic_Page_1APAGS Diversity Infographic_Page_2

 

APAGS Diversity Infographic_Page_3APAGS Diversity Infographic

Editor’s Note: This infographic was developed by the following APAGS members (listed alphabetically): Klaus Eickhoff Cavalhieri, Lincoln Hill, Kiet Huynh, J. L. Stewart, Joelle Taknint, and María D. Vázquez.