Category Archives: Graduate School

Which advisor is right for you? (Source: "Professor Fink" by Profound Whatever on Flickr. Some rights reserved.)

Selecting your graduate advisor and lab: Details matter

Which advisor is right for you? (Source: "Professor Fink" by Profound Whatever on Flickr. Some rights reserved.)

Which advisor is right for you? (Source: “Professor Fink” by Profound Whatever on Flickr. Some rights reserved.)

A previous blog post by Drs. Ameen and El-Ghoroury made some excellent points about the graduate school decision. In this post I will share a few in-depth strategies about selecting an advisor for a research-oriented doctoral program.

I was extremely lucky to find an advisor like Dr. Jennifer Vonk, but you probably want to minimize the influence of luck on your experience. After listening to many cases of relinquished doctoral students, I realized that in many ways, applying to work with your advisor is a gamble. Here is a person who is primarily responsible for your career, yet you know very little about them.

The points I mention here are based on my experiences and conversations with undergraduate students over the years.

First, the structure of admissions to a research-intensive graduate program is quite different from a typical undergraduate admissions process. Your standardized test scores and academic accomplishments are important, but what ultimately matters is what you are able to bring to the lab and to the program. Therefore, during your program research, it can be useful to consider where you would fit in the best based on your best qualities.

Second, shortlisting potential programs from a broad database like Graduate Study in Psychology is just the beginning. Be prepared to start focusing on the seemingly minute details – current and past research produced by your advisor’s lab, for example – which will make a huge impact on your experience. These details can be found by combing through the CVs and recent publications of prospective advisors.  As you to do your homework, check on these particular variables:

  1. How frequently they publish: If you are not fully aware of this factor, you may end up being surprised or disappointed after you join the lab. The publication frequency (along with the quality) usually indicates their general research activity level, and might provide hints in terms of what they expect from their students.
  2. The quality of journals they usually publish in: Generally speaking, journals with higher impact-factors publish better research (details are a bit too complex for this post). APA has its own journal database where you can read more on each of their journals (and their impact factors). You can also gauge the impact of non-APA journals through some basic online research.
  3. How often they include graduate students as co-authors: This is an important factor because to be a successful researcher you need to have something to show for your work. Advisors usually have their own criteria for authorship such as who came up with the most important idea, or who worked the most of the project, and so forth. In case you are not sure how authorship is decided, or how frequently their graduate students are publishing, these may be important questions to bring up during your interview.
  4. The research interests of other students in the lab: Your lab-mates might be the ones you spend most of your time around. They can be quite influential in your work in terms of your class discussions, research collaborations and your lab’s focus. Reading about previous students in the lab, you can gauge what types of topics the lab usually handles and how flexible the research focus might be.
  5. The thematic aspect of multiple research papers: If you really want to know what your advisor likes, dislikes, finds interesting, or is strongly opinionated about, you need to go through their research publications in detail. If you go through several of their papers, you can find out which theories they like or dislike, what arguments they find compelling or weak, and what are their general views on their subject of interest. While research papers won’t tell you everything you need to know about an advisor’s interpersonal qualities, doing this review might stave off a complete falling-out between student and advisor.

These are some (of the many) points that prospective applicants to research-oriented doctoral programs in psychology are often unaware of, but can have a huge impact on their academic careers. Taking these into consideration may significantly lower your likelihood of facing unwanted surprises or disappointments in your new program and lab.

 

Chinmay Aradhye

Editor’s note: Chinmay Aradhye is a third-year student in the Experimental Psychology PhD. program, Department of Psychology, Oakland University. He is also the APAGS Michigan State Advocacy Coordinator.  Contact him at caradhye@oakland.edu.

 

Celebrating Excellent Training

Is your training program doing an excellent job of preparing you as a future psychologist? If so, APAGS wants to know.

As Member at Large – Education Focus, one of my goals was to highlight programs that do what works well for student success. We often focus on our disappointments and areas where we need advocacy in training, but there are a number of students who feel pretty good about their training. The voices of these students are also important, because one way to improve training is to know who is doing it well.

To do this, email me at ccrowell2005@yahoo.com with the subject: Celebrating Excellent Training. Write a brief one-paragraph message about how your program is doing an excellent job. We’d like to highlight this on our blog over the next few months.

Candice Crowell

Early Convention Tips and Tricks

Are you planning to go to the APA Convention in Toronto on 2015? It may be tough to think about something that seems so far away, but it might be helpful to start planning since this year it will be in another country!

When preparing to trToronto skyline in the dayavel to Canada, the first thing you need is a passport. If you do not already have one, or need a replacement or renewal, you should definitely consider applying soon. Processing times take anywhere between 8 business days to 6 weeks depending on how urgent you need it. Get started today by visiting the Bureau of Consular Affairs. Passport

After getting your passport, there are other steps that you might want to consider planning in advance. If you submitted a proposal that was accepted for presentation and you are a first author, your registration fee will be waived if you are also an APAGS member!

Other ways to get some funding for travel would be to look at travel grants.  Different sections and divisions of APA offer various types of funding. APAGS offers the Convention Travel award for first time convention attendees.  The deadline to apply for this award is TODAY, April 1, 2015. The APA Science Directorate also offers assistance for psychology graduate students to travel to the Convention.

Some APA Divisions of APA also offer funding for Convention travel. Be sure to check with any Division to which you are a member to see what type of funding is provided for students to attend Convention. You may also consider joining your Division’s listserv to get information on services and funding provided by your Division.

After getting your passport, and applying for funding, low cost travel would be the next thing for you to consider. Sites like Expedia  and Kayak  are popular for cheap travel, while accommodation sites include Hostels.com and AirBnB  among others.

Do stay tuned for more tips and tricks to help you plan your Convention travel!

Meet the Candidates! APAGS Chair-Elect

300VoteDid you know that the voting period for APAGS elections is the entire month of April? This blog post is the third in a series in which  candidates answer questions posed by the current committee. Today, you’ll get a chance to hear from the two candidates for APAGS Chair-Elect: Ian Gutierrez and Michael Williams.  APAGS members will be provided with voting instructions in the beginning of April and will have the chance to vote for this position, as well as Member-at-Large, Education Focus and Member-at-Large, Communications Focus.

Chair-Elect

Question: If you weren’t studying psychology, what other career would you pursue and why? 

Ian Gutierrez – Truthfully, psychology is that “other career” that I ultimately chose to pursue. My teenage dream was to become a record producer! Before graduate school, I worked as a follow-spot operator on Broadway musicals, including Spring Awakening and Gypsy, and I also worked as an audio technician on a few productions of Menopause the Musical (…honest truth, can’t make this up). While I enjoyed working in the entertainment business, I decided that I could more directly impact people’s lives for the better in another line of work. Psychology fit that bill perfectly, and I have never looked back since making that career transition. If I were not studying psychology, I would likely work in public policy. The impact that state and federal law has on public well-being, mental health, and psychological science is enormous. It is critical that mental health professionals and scientists remain engaged in the political arena.

Michael Williams – This question is challenging given that I have wanted to be a psychologist since elementary school. However, pursuit of an academic research career in neuroscience would be a strong alternate to my current career path in clinical psychology for many reasons. This field offers me the opportunity to continue engagement in research regarding brain injury and recovery. In addition, I could continue my other pursuits, including teaching, providing mentorship to undergraduate and graduate students, and engaging in community leadership. Neuroscience was my minor during undergraduate studies. I was fortunate to get undergraduate research training at Morehouse School of Medicine Neuroscience Institute in Dr. Byron Ford’s lab. This lab experience was amazing. I learned about rat models of neuroprotection and recovery for brain damage secondary to organophosphate poisoning and ischemic stroke. A career in neuroscience would nurture my passion for research of brain injury and my desire for an academic career.

 

Question: APAGS is doing a lot regarding the internship crisis, and plans to continue doing so. What do you think is another major issue affecting graduate students, and how do you hope to address the issue if elected as Chair? (150 word maximum)

Ian Gutierrez – The student debt crisis threatens the future of professional psychology. Educational debt in the United States exceeds one trillion dollars, creating long-term financial hardships that many of us know all too well. At the same time, graduate school is becoming increasingly expensive. Even those of us who are employed to teach or conduct research struggle to make ends meet on limited incomes. Meager incomes and heavy debts make it nearly impossible for many of us to start families, access quality healthcare, or save for the future. As APAGS Chair, I will advocate for APA program accreditation standards that account for and limit rising graduate program costs. I will also push for the establishment of APA/APAGS-supported loan assistance programs to help students pay down debts while they are still in graduate school. To learn more about my APAGS initiatives, please visit my website or email me. Thank you!

Michael Williams – Funding for graduate students in psychology is a major issue. APAGS has a done a great job examining debt load, job trends, and starting salaries. The median debt load for PsyD graduates is $120,000. It is $80,000 for PhD health service professions and $32,000 for research PhDs. Student debt has raised over time. Academia is a primary employment setting, but the full-time tenure track academic positions are declining. With the delayed entry into the workforce, debt becomes a major burden to many graduates. As Chair, I would work with APAGS to explore innovative ways to develop and identify new funding sources. I would consider ways to incentivize applying for grants and other funding mechanisms. I would collaborate with different students organizations to promote the many resources compiled by APAGS, including grants and fellowships. In addition, I hope to empower students with tools to get involved with advocacy for funding opportunities.

 

*****

Learn more about all candidates and be sure to vote in the upcoming APAGS election! If you are a current APAGS member with a valid email address on file, you’ll get your email ballot on April 1. If you do not receive one, please check your email spam filters and junk box. If you still do not see one, please contact Garnett Coad, the APA Director of Elections.

Meet the Candidates! Member-at-Large, Communications Focus

300VoteAre you voting for APAGS officers? This blog post is the second in a series of posts where candidates for open positions will answer questions to give voters some insight into what they will bring to the position for which they are running. Today, we’re meeting candidates for Member-at-Large, Communications Focus.

The voting period for APAGS elections will be the entire month of April. APAGS members will be provided with voting instructions in the beginning of April and will have the chance to vote for the following positions:

  • APAGS Chair-Elect
  • APAGS Member-at-Large, Education Focus
  • APAGS Member-at-Large, Communications Focus

Member-at-Large, Communications Focus

Question: If you weren’t studying psychology, what other career would you pursue and why? 

Chris DeCou – I would still be employed as a police officer, which is the career I left to pursue graduate training. Law enforcement offered me an opportunity to serve the community and address hazardous situations directly. As a police officer my focus centered on limiting the gap between the public and the police. If I were not studying psychology I would be actively involved in community policing initiatives that focused on promoting direct communication between officers and community members, and emphasized elimination of longstanding barriers to community trust and collaboration, as law enforcement still emphasizes arrest and detention as simple solutions to complex problems. Further, I would continue growing the paradigm of policing to center on restorative justice, evidence-driven policy, and genuine collaboration between law enforcement and affected stakeholders. These goals remain with me as a graduate student, and continue to influence my research with incarcerated populations and survivors of violence.

Yolanda Perkins-Volk – I recently had this conversation with my 3 year-old son, and he giggled when I told him I would be a firefighter. It is a career path I have a lot of respect for. During my time in the US Army, I learned that I can push myself physically and mentally farther than I had ever previously thought, and studying fire science and putting it to use seems like an exciting way to exercise both my mind and my body. I have to share, my heart was full when my son shared that he too has interest in being a firefighter!

David Zelaya – When I was applying to graduate programs, I was torn between pursuing psychology and student affairs. Specifically, I wanted to focus on retention and leadership development of first generation college students. Being a first generation college student myself, I can attest to the impact higher education administration had during and after my undergraduate studies. Many of the mentors I had were influential in helping me develop a foundation as a leader and hone in on my personal leadership style and skills. In addition to being drawn to higher education, I was also attracted to student affairs due to the emphasis that it places on mentorship and connecting with young adults at such a critical age. Yet, I found that I could also enact change and influence others through various careers within the field of psychology; whether it be through pursuing an academic career or college counseling.

Question: A challenge for this Member at Large is to promote collaboration and conversation between very busy people. What would you suggest to improve APAGS’s current communication practices?  (150 word maximum)

Chris DeCou – My primary goal as member-at-large would be to expand the geographic diversity of APAGS and APA via focused recruitment efforts at universities without current representation, including universities in rural and frontier states (e.g., Alaska, Idaho, Montana). This type of effort relies heavily on existing communication practices with APAGS, including regular email announcements and quarterly offerings in GradPsych. One way I would expand existing practices to include students from geographically diverse backgrounds would be to develop an effective mechanism for sampling the opinions of student members via survey and focus group methods. This would include brief surveys organized via readily accessible platforms (e.g. social media), and targeted focus groups composed of members from specific subsets of programs represented by APAGS. I have benefited greatly from the use of these methods within my own research projects, and look forward to cultivating effective ways of sampling student members directly to inform APAGS initiatives.

Yolanda Perkins-Volk – Personally, while I enjoy all of the wonderful resources that can be found through APA and APAGS, I think now may be a great time to begin considering more intuitive, real-time communication methods that best utilize current technology, and is accessible through existing platforms and propagated to mobile devices. Perhaps this looks like an app, it may mean creating a space that is new, yet versatile and brings value. No matter the method, the common thread is moving forward in a manner to make technology a tool that we harness to best meet our mission in APAGS!

David Zelaya – As graduate students, we tend to be highly connected to social media; therefore, exploring ways to communicate effectively online would be a starting point. I would suggest that we work on enhancing the Division Student Representative Network by conducting an assessment of what division student leaders still need from APAGS and to explore possible ways to collaborate. In my experience with APAGS-CARED I have found that finding commonalities in projects or goals with other students or divisions fosters collaborative working groups and opens conversations. Therefore, connecting the APAGS full committee to division student leaders will be imperative in enhancing communication practices. Additionally, it is difficult to connect with graduate student leaders if they are unaware of the role of APAGS and the resources available. Developing a marketing plan will raise visibility of the resources APAGS has to offer to support graduate student training. Visit me online for more info.

*****

On Friday, check out our final post in this series to meet the candidates running for Chair-Elect. Also, be sure to vote in the upcoming APAGS election!