Category Archives: Graduate School

CARED Perspectives – Racism on our College Campuses: What can we do about it?

This blog post is a part of the series, “CARED Perspectives,” developed by the APAGS Committee for the Advancement of Racial and Ethnic Diversity. Posts in this series will discuss current events and how these events relate to graduate students in psychology. If you are interested in contributing to the CARED Perspectives series, please contact Lincoln Hill.

Racism on our College Campuses: What can we do about it?

By Ryan C. Warner

Unfortunately, racial incidents often occur  frequently in today’s higher education institutions. Just recently in April 2018, a series of racial incidents transpired on the campus of DePauw University in Greencastle, Indiana. A racist threat was found in a restroom on campus. A student dressed in blackface and wearing an offensive sign was seen at a local bar, and the word “nigger” was spelled out in stones at the DePauw Nature Park. During the same month, a Greek fraternity at Syracuse University in New York posted a six-minute video online showing a member saying an oath that included the statement: “I solemnly swear to always have hatred in my heart for Niggers, Spics, and most importantly the (expletive) Kykes.”

Similar to the rest of society, colleges and universities are not immune to racial discrimination. With “Blackface” party incidents and “noose” hangings making news at numerous universities all over the country, racially underrepresented students face challenges beyond the academic scope of tests, papers, and projects.

As a current graduate student of color who has attended various predominantly white universities, I can attest to the fact that racial discrimination can be displayed covertly (e.g., microaggressions) or overtly. These incidences have a profound impact of an individual’s well-being, and can impact their retention and life satisfaction. But the main question is, “what can we do about it?”

At the individual level, we need to all stand up to racial injustice when it occurs. Silence is compliance and only encourages and enhances racial injustice in the world. Individuals of all backgrounds and skin colors should point out bigotry when they see it, which will ultimately create social awareness and bring light to these issues.

At the institutional level, university leaders should make systemic changes to enhance inclusivity for students of color. One example may include requiring that all students, faculty, and staff attend diversity training focusing on racial equality and inclusion. Additionally, ensuring that campuses have a bias incident report system in place can offer a resource for students to document their experiences of racial microaggressions, which may assist with providing evidence that these incidences do in fact exist. This documentation may be useful with further presenting evidence for the need of diversity resources and inclusivity programming.

It is also important that resources be available at a professional organization level. For instance, the American Psychological Association (APA) and other organizations have various divisions/resources that can assist with supporting graduate students (e.g., Committee for the Advancement of Racial & Ethnic Diversity, Division 45, AAPA, SIP, AMENA-Psy, ABPsi, NLPA, etc.). Conducting webinars and disseminating information to academic programs may assist with providing students helpful coping strategies to use when experiencing racial stress in their programs.

For additional resources please visit:

We want to hear what you think! Please share your thoughts on this topic in the comments section below.

Other posts in this series:

 

The Graduate Student Guide to Getting Your S**t Together

MPj04440980000[1]This is it: the time when it seems like every professor, every research conference, every supervisor has come together to plot how to make these last few weeks a mad fury of papers, projects, sweat, and tears for us graduate students.

In the midst of this chaos, it is all too easy to let certain things – the less pressing papers, the cleanliness of our apartments, our mental well-being- slip by the wayside. In an effort to alleviate some of that relentless pressure, I present tips for the graduate student to keep their s**t together.

  • Make a to-do list and put everything on there. The most empowering to-do lists are those which are a combination of tasks you hope to get done (write that report, make that call) and those you will get done anyway unless some catastrophic event occurs (i.e., see that patient, go to that class). With a to-do list like this, you check off more things and get a better picture of how amazingly productive you are, and that can be all the fuel you need to get more of the things done.
  • Break down your bigger tasks. Rome wasn’t built in a day and neither is a dissertation – when planning out your tasks don’t simply write in ‘dissertation’ but small, tangible goals that can be accomplished in 1-2 hour blocks (e.g., ‘write intro paragraph’; ‘find depression measure’; ‘draft Table 1’).
  • Five minutes can be a damn good start to some things. We all know what the hardest part of a task is…. Getting started. Whether it is the first draft of an abstract, writing a few emails, or starting the blog post you keep meaning to do, using small bouts of time productively can really add up.

Continue reading →

If Helplessness is Learned, Success Can Also be Learned

What is learned helplessness?

Sometimes, we set low expectations or do not try to seize new opportunities because we do not want to be faced with disappointment. While there may be reasons for such behavior, it can really limit the scope of experiences we allow ourselves to have.

When people experience failure repeatedly, they often tend to give up without trying, even if they have the ability to succeed. This is called “learned helplessness.” Learned helplessness is a phenomenon coined by Martin Seligman and Steven Maier while studying avoidance learning and formation of fear conditioning.

In 1967, at the University of Pennsylvania, Seligman and Maier separated 24 dogs into three groups. The dogs were put into harnesses and received electric shocks. In group 1 (escape group), dogs could end the electric shocks by pressing a lever with their noses. In group 2 (no-escape group/experiment group):, they did not have a lever and could not avoid the electric shocks. In group 3 (no harness control group), dogs did not receive any electric shock.

After spending 24 hours in harnesses, the dogs were placed in a different box in which they could avoid the electrical shocks by jumping over a low barrier to the other side.  Here’s what happened: Dogs in group 1 and 3 avoided electric shocks by jumping over the barrier, but dogs in group 2  — the group that had no choice to avoid the shocks — crouched in the corner and received all shock. That is, the dogs in group 2 exhibited learned helplessness. Seligman found that after repeated failures of avoiding electric shocks, the dogs in group 2 learned that their behavior didn’t impact the electric shocks and the shocks were uncontrollable. Thus, the dogs gave up trying to avoid the electric shocks altogether.

Learned helplessness can be easily observed in our everyday lives. For example, if one studies hard for math exams but consistently does not earn good grades, that person may stop investing time in studying math. Or, if a person is unable to find a job even after applying and interviewing many times, they can eventually give up and discontinue their job search. Learned helplessness can be seen in politics as well. People are able to cast votes in elections but if they feel that there is no change, some will give up and stop voting. The thought, “Even if I vote, nothing changes,” becomes inscribed in their minds.

When we cannot control our external environment, we can fall into helplessness and stop trying to improve our situation.

What are the signs of learned helplessness?

Learned helplessness has three core characteristics:

  • When a person faces failure of learning, he or she shows the tendency to give up.
  • A person avoids one’s responsibility as the cause of failure.
  • When one’s responsibility is recognized, there is tendency to attribute the cause of failure to one’s lack of ability rather than lack of effort.

If one attributes the cause of negative events to one’s fault (internal attribution), one considers oneself more negatively than in the case of attributing the cause to environment or other people (external attribution).

The experience of repeated failure causes emotional, motivational, and cognitive harm. The resulting combination of signs include lack of confidence, depression or negative perception, lack of control, lack of persistence, and lack of responsibility. If such signs are neglected without proper treatment for an extended period of time, they could turn into disorders that threaten one’s social psychological well-being.

How can we overcome learned helplessness?

To overcome learned helplessness, we should increase the number of successful experiences by setting achievable goals.  For example, if the goal is to learn a foreign language, set an attainable goal such as memorizing 10 vocabulary words in that language. Once this goal has been achieved, it will create a positive memory of success. These continued positive experiences will gradually build confidence. Later, you can set goals with a higher level of difficulty and gradually push away negative memories of failure. These small achievements can help reduce the effects of learned helplessness.

Another technique to overcome learned helplessness is to grow “failure resistance.” That is, the ability to overcome failure and maintain a positive outlook.  To effectively grow failure resistance and escape from situations of helplessness, people can encourage themselves to think positively and reframe negative thoughts. For example, think about a failure as an obstacle to overcome in order to reach an ultimate success. This reframe helps to put negative experiences into perspective and will keep you from spiraling into helplessness.

If we do not give up, even in moments of pain and despair, a whole new world can open up for us. For example, persistence can help us land a new job that can lead to new, interesting paths — or lead us to friendships with people who initially did not seem to fit in our lives. These are completely unexpected experiences. But if we do not try, the opportunity for a variety of experiences will be drastically reduced.

If helplessness has been learned, success can also be learned.

 

Hanna Park received her Bachelor’s degree in Psychology at Columbia University and Master’s degree in Cognitive Studies in Education at Teachers College, Columbia University. She currently works as a journalist for the Korean Psychological Association.

CARED Perspectives: Ensuring That All Children Have a Seat at the Table When Discussing Gun Reform

This blog post is the first in the series, “CARED Perspectives,” developed by the APAGS Committee for the Advancement of Racial and Ethnic Diversity. This series will discuss current events and how these events relate to graduate students in psychology. If you are interested in contributing to the CARED Perspectives series, please contact Lincoln Hill.

Ensuring that All Children Have a Seat at the Table When Discussing Gun Reform

By Lincoln Hill

In response to the Marjory Stoneman Douglas school shooting on February 14th, 2018 where 17 people were killed and many more were  injured, student survivors organized and are continuing to develop youth-led protests to advocate for comprehensive legislation towards gun reform. Despite the acuity of the recent traumatic events that impacted their whole community, these students participated in a nationally televised townhall with elected officials just one week after the shooting, publicly challenging these officials to pass gun reform legislation; organized a march with approximately 832 events worldwide to keep children safer in schools just five weeks later; and structured a national school walkout day inviting students across the world to participate.

Many, myself included, have been astonished by what these students have accomplished in such a short amount of time (and with minimal adult intervention) . As a graduate assistant with Loyola University Chicago’s Center for the Human Rights of Children, I view the student led protests as a prime example of tenets from the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child in action, particularly the child’s right to participate in decision making processes that directly affect them. Additionally,  as a Black counseling psychologist-in-training with a focus on the mental health of racial/ethnic minority students, I am primarily struck by the public’s receptiveness to these youth-led protests compared to more critical media coverage of similar youth-led initiatives advocating for the safety of Black youth such as Black Lives Matter and The Dream Defenders. What do these response variations mean from a social justice perspective, particularly when efforts to advocate on behalf of Black youth who are disproportionately impacted by gun violence aren’t viewed as favorably by the public?

In the US, Black children and adolescents are excessively impacted by gun violence and are four times more likely to die by guns when compared to their White counterparts. Perhaps this stark reality contributes to the extremely high rate of suicide among Black children ages 5-11 years old — a rate that has nearly doubled in the past two decades, while that of White children has steadily decreased.  For children and adolescents living in violent neighborhoods and communities, witnessing shootings can lead to a plethora of psychosocial hardships including posttraumatic stress that can impact them into adulthood.

As psychologists-in-training, we have a duty to respond and support all children impacted by gun violence including those commonly left out of discourses pertaining to gun reform. While we take steps as a field advocating for legislative changes protecting the rights of children, we must challenge ourselves to provide platforms that amplify all children’s voices.

We want to hear what you think! Please share your thoughts on this topic in the comments section below.

Graduate Student Researchers for the Win

adult-attractive-beauty-255268Have you ever wondered how to get financial support for your research? APA maintains a directory with hundreds of opportunities for funding psychological research. Today, we take a closer look at one particular grant for graduate students and the amazing projects that will be getting a $1,000 boost.

Every year, APAGS sponsors the Psychological Science Research Grant (PSRG) to provide support for several graduate students conducting psychology research, with additional funding reserved specifically for diversity-focused studies. This $1,000 grant is used to fund innovative psychological science research projects. Graduate students in all fields of psychology and neuroscience (who are also APA student affiliates) are eligible.

PSRG netted a very competitive applicant pool this year. After careful review, 14 applicants were selected to receive funding. These students span several universities and research areas, including social, cognitive, clinical, community, evolutionary, and moral psychology. Seven of these proposed research projects specifically related to diversity, as defined by APA’s 2017 Multicultural Guidelines.

Here’s a brief peek of the 2017 winning projects:

  • Steven Hobaica (Washington State University) will be studying transgender individuals in cisnormative sex education. Steven aims to understand how exclusive educational experiences may affect transgender individuals’ physical and mental health outcomes, self-conceptions, and relationships.
  • Laura Werner (University of Nevada, Las Vegas) will be studying the aging of working memory. Laura plans to investigate whether processing speed and inhibition account for different aspects of working memory performance and age-related decline in working memory.
  • Amanda Sanchez (Florida International University) will be studying whether cultural formulation improves satisfaction, treatment engagement, and clinical outcomes among traditionally underserved children. As part of a dissertation, Amanda plans to augment assessment procedures for child behavior problems with a brief cultural assessment, as well as assess the effects of barriers to care on this augmentation.
  • Alyssa De Vito (Louisiana State University) will be studying the predictive utility of intraindividual cognitive variability measures as an early marker of cognitive decline. Alyssa will be working with individuals with mild cognitive impairment and analyzing intraindividual variability in executive functioning, memory, and timed performance tasks.
  • Erica Page (University of Cincinnati) will be developing and testing a causal framework between microaggressions and negative health outcomes. Erica aims to determine if microaggressions elicit physiological stress responses and lead to declines in working memory performance.
  • Amy Wing-Lam Chong (Cornell University) will be examining the extent to which age-related performance differences on the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) can be explained by reductions in exploration preferences and learning, and differences in risk preferences.
  • Julia Briskin (Wayne State University) will be studying the effect smartphone usage during in-person interactions with romantic partners has on romantic relationships. Julia’s research will provide and empirically test a theoretical framework to understand this effect, and identify potential ways to mitigate it.
  • Kyle Simon (University of Kentucky) will be developing a scale for conceptual future parenthood grief in LGBTQ+ individuals. Kyle plans to assess the reliability and validity of a newly created measure that gauges the level of grief that LGBTQ+ people experience about potentially never achieving a parenting identity.
  • Haley Bell (University of Nebraska-Lincoln) will be developing a multidimensional measure of gender dysphoria. Haley aims to develop, validate, and assess the reliability of the Gender Dysphoria Measure.
  • Megan Williams (University of Pennsylvania) will be studying body odors’ influence on mate quality estimation. Megan is interested in the mechanism by which body odors inform mate quality assessment, specifically sexual disgust and sexual attraction.
  • Megan Goldring (Columbia University) will be studying morality, social conformity, and blame attributions. Megan’s research on moral decision making will investigate the extent to which attributions of blame and praise depend on social conformity factors, agency, and intent, for judgements of commonplace and severe moral transgressions.
  • Sarah Arango (University of Texas at Austin) will be studying the ways that Syrian refugee youth living in Jordan develop resilience and cope with trauma and chronic stress. As a dissertation study, Sarah aims to examine the link between daily stressors, traumatic events, coping flexibility, well-being, and psychological distress in this population.
  • Hanan Hashem (University of Texas at Austin) will study solo status, religious identity, and ethnic identity as predictors of psychological distress and discrimination of American Muslim women.
  • Rachel Sweenie (University of Florida) will study the associations between stable and fluctuating psychosocial variables and inhaled corticosteroid treatment adherence, using ecological momentary assessment.

Congratulations to all our winners. We are excited to see whose name will be on the list next year. We hope it is yours! Be sure to send in your application before the deadline in early December for the 2018 PSRG.

The APAGS Science Committee would like to thank and acknowledge the help and support we received in reviewing applications this year. This includes members of the APAGS CARED and CSOGD Committees, as well as our Ad Hoc Reviewers: Emily Bernstein, Harvard University; Joshua Goodman , UC Santa Barbara; Danielle Krusemark, Florida State University; Brittany Lang, University of South Florida; and Danielle Taylor, Oklahoma State University.

Written by:

Brielle James (BS), Member, APAGS Science Committee                                                       Renee Cloutier (MS), Chair, APAGS Science Committee